YorkSpace has migrated to a new version of its software. Access our Help Resources to learn how to use the refreshed site. Contact diginit@yorku.ca if you have any questions about the migration.
 

Ethnic, Class, and Occupational Identities in Shakespeare’s Names

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2009

Authors

Smith, Grant

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

York University

Abstract

The clarity of ethnic, class, and occupational identities in Shakespeare’s names contributes significantly to the verisimilitude of his art. In contrast to Ben Jonson, and other theatrical rivals, Shakespeare used relatively few names that are obviously descriptive – such as Frugal, Tradewell, or Stargaze in Jonson’s The City Madam. Shakespeare’s naming shows that his imagination was focused on stage action rather than on references that might appear in print. He designated a large percentage of characters actually appearing on stage in terms of social groups, e.g., “Certaine Commoners” (Julius Caesar), and identified minor individuals to clarify functional roles (“Messenger”) or for wordplay, e.g., “Cobbler” (Julius Caesar). Shakespeare drew very clear distinctions in social class in his uses of socially distinctive names and formal titles. He also made ethnic differences clear in the names where ethnicity seems unimportant to the action (e.g., the spelling of Alonso in The Tempest), but he seems deliberately to have avoided common ethnic associations when the names are mentioned frequently by other characters and ethnicity is a major theme – e.g., Aaron (Titus Andronicus) and Othello (Othello). By avoiding names that are specifically associative with ethnic minorities, Shakespeare lends these major ethnic characters greater individuality and dignity.

Description

Keywords

Class and Occupation Identities in Shakespeare, Ethnic, Naming in Shakespeare

Citation

Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Onomastic Sciences